Showing posts with label inflation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inflation. Show all posts

Saturday, June 11, 2016

"Our money is broken, and we need to fix it"



"...Minimum wage advocates seek to solve a legitimate problem facing American workers: their dollars buy less and less every year. But simply mandating employers fork over more dollars is a little like putting a band-aide on an amputation. It doesn’t do anything to address the underlying problem.

Does earn today, spend tomorrow, conflict with borrow to spend today
and hope to earn enough tomorrow, or that someone else does?

...when the government debases currency, a dollar no longer buys the same amount of stuff it once did. Quantitative easing debases the currency and the Federal Reserve has engaged in the practice for years.

...the minimum wage stood at $1.25. To put it another way, a minimum wage worker earned five silver quarters for every hour worked. Today, you can’t even buy a cup of coffee with those five quarters.

But the silver melt-value of those five quarters today stands at over $15.

There’s your $15 per hour minimum wage.

Regardless of the dollar price involved,
one ounce of gold would purchase a good-quality man's suit
at the conclusion of the Revolutionary War, the Civil War,
the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt, and today.



Peter A. Burshre

This vividly illustrates currency debasement. In terms of purchasing power, the value of the silver remains relatively stable, but the value of a dollar shrinks.

...Today, it takes 60 quarters to make up the $15 minimum wage advocates want. If you paid that in 1964 silver quarters, the value of the metal would be something in the neighborhood of $175!

...The politicians and central bankers claim their policies stabilize economies and protect the people from currency debasement. But in truth, these policies only enrich the politically well-connected"

http://schiffgold.com/key-gold-news/we-dont-have-a-wage-problem-we-have-a-money-problem/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=psgn-weekly&utm_campaign=16-06-10

Athenian money…defined a pattern
which was to repeat in other empires which were to follow,
dominance of trade, influx of gold to balance exports, public wealth,
liberty, overconfidence, the discovery of loosely managed money
as a stimulating solution to stagnation in an economy near its zenith…,
before finally the emptiness of the monetary promise was exposed,
leading to rapid national collapse.

Paul Tustain

Why did the Roman Empire reduce currency size and silver content
to increase the quantity of money during war against Hannibal?

Where under the [Roman] Principate the strategy had been
to tax the future to pay for the present,
the Dominate paid for the present by undermining the future’s ability to pay taxes.



The Empire emerged from the third century crisis,
but at a cost that weakened its ability to meet future crises.



Joseph Tainter

Did Spanish money become worth less
after the Emperor borrowed against 100 years of future tax revenue
to pay for war against England?

Did France execute relatively the same strategy
with similar consequences not long after?

By the time the great bullion inflow had ended in the mid-seventeenth century,
the Spanish crown was deep in debt, with bankruptcies in 1557, 1575 and 1597.

Like high cost oil producing regions of today

The country entered upon a long decline.

…one might draw a moral: Easy money is bad for you.

It represents short-run gain
that will be paid for in immediate distortions and later regrets.

The Wealth and Poverty of Nations

Why did the Continental Congress issue paper money
backed by anticipated tax revenues to pay for war against theocratic England?

Friday, August 21, 2015

Ready for the Federal Reserve to come to the 'rescue', again?

If a nation prints more money,
like cutting a 16 inch pizza into 16 slices instead of 8,
is each slice worth less?

Nations are not ruined by one act of violence
but quite often, gradually, and almost imperceptibly
by the depreciation of their currency through excessive quantity

Nicolas Copernicus
Discovered Earth was not the center of the Universe

If Nathaniel Rothschild accumulated gold
essential for supporting an army upon Napoleon’s return
in anticipation of an extensive military conflict
and rapidly increasing government borrowing
and profitably exchanged relatively high priced gold
for lower cost debt
in anticipation of sovereign debt stability
upon Napoleon’s defeat by Britain's Wellington at Waterloo in 1815,
could current circumstances reflect something like the same thing
only opposite?

If Germany’s central bank suspended the right
to redeem gold backed Reichsmarks during World War I
and 170 Reichsmarks bought an ounce of gold in January 1919
why did an ounce of gold cost 87,000,000,000,000 Reichsmarks
in November 1923?

"Now in modern markets
it is striking that exactly the reverse…applies

Governments all over the world
are about to flood the bond markets with paper
to finance their bank bailouts and economic stimulus plans...

…governments are about to need to raise the funds
to fight another Napoleon

This massive new supply of [electronically 'printed' money]
[could]depress the price of existing bonds

…governments all over the world
have embarked on massive money creation"

Peter Cooper
Seeking Alpha
(Hat tip for the Rothchild metaphor)

What if the pizza shrinks 
while the number of slices rise?