Showing posts with label Margaret Moffett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Margaret Moffett. Show all posts

Monday, August 1, 2016

Margaret Moffett's answer to who owns the Civil Rights Museum property

"City attorney: City Council could use museum building as collateral on loan

The city could use the International Civil Rights Center & Museum building as collateral on money owed to local taxpayers, City Attorney Tom Carruthers said Thursday in a letter to museum officials.

...the city expects either cash or collateral for the remaining amount, he wrote.

...“We will, however, recommend to council that it accept an appropriate deed of trust against the museum building to secure our debt in lieu of our rights under our current agreement,” he continued.

...The City Council is poised to discuss the loan balance during a special meeting Monday. Museum officials said earlier this week that they won’t attend, hoping instead to work out these figures with city staffers.

But in his letter Carruthers urged them to reconsider.

“This meeting was specifically set for council to consider these items and discuss them with you,” he wrote...

How can the cash-strapped museum get the money to make those payments?

Carruthers’ letter points to a new solution, one that would give the city financial leverage but possibly ratchet up tensions between the two parties.
Using the old Woolworth’s building at 134 S. Elm St. as collateral.

The building sits in the very heart of downtown — the corner of South Elm Street and February One Place. Its tax value is about $3.8 million, according to the Guilford County Tax Department.

...such a move would put the city at the front of the line for payments if the nonprofit museum’s board were ever to sell the building.

It was unclear Friday how museum officials might receive the suggestion."

http://www.greensboro.com/news/city-attorney-city-council-could-use-museum-building-as-collateral/article_5d5e9928-329f-57d6-af41-ed704923fc2e.html

Bruce Wiley · The University of North Carolina at Greensboro - UNCG

Margaret, who owns the building? Names of people not corporations. Is the museum being run as a for profit entity? Do Skip and Earl have offices in the building and do they conduct business not related to the ICRM from those offices. Who pays for their cell phones? Are they subject to FOIA requests due to the use of taxpayer provided funds?

Like · Reply · Jul 30, 2016 10:55am
.
.
Margaret Moffett · Reporter at Greensboro News & Record

Bruce those are all very, very good questions. Who owns the building? When the museum entered into this complicated tax-credit system, it had to create 4 or 5 new for-profit entities to set up the system. One of those for-profits is called "Museum Landlord." It technically owns the building. It's directors are Earl Jones, Deena Hayes-Greene and Doug Harris.

What is Museum Landlord on the hook for?

Nothing

Can the owners take rent payments out of what could be a non-profit Museum?

Yes, which Margaret didn't report

Now, at some point in the next few months, when the tax-credit structure expires, the museum will revert back to a nonprofit. I have no idea whether they'll use the old nonprofit structure or create a new one. And that gets me to the answer to all of your other questions: I don't know.

Journalistic negligence

The museum isn't subject to any public records laws. Anything connected to the city (or the county or state) is public record by extension, and I make sure I always get those records. But their own records? No. I can't compel them to make them public. All I can do is explain that transparency is the absolute best answer to every question. I'm just as frustrated as you and other people are by the lack of information. As always, I appreciate your comments and that you continue to ask for answers.

Like · Reply · Jul 30, 2016 3:53pm

Bullshit

Look up the deed Margaret

Ask Len Lucas

Not knowing rigged 2013's Mayoral race

Now you don't want to admit it

From the Comments;

Not that it matters;

Does the Museum’s Landlord stand to earn income from the property under any scenario?

"Possibly, if their museum tour/ticket sales increase."

Thank you,

Public Information Desk
City of Greensboro
300 W. Washington Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
.
.
That means now that the City has forgiven some of the loan, Skip Alston and friends stand to financially benefit.
.
.
"...Some LLCs are responsible for the museum’s debt, others aren’t.

...Sit-In Movement Inc. is one of the five companies that make up the museum. The other four are Civil Rights Museum LLC, ICRCM LLC, Museum Tenant LLC and Museum Landlord LLC.

...Sit-In Movement Inc. does not own the building. According to Guilford County tax records, the building is owned by Museum Landlord LLC. The North Carolina secretary of state’s office lists former Guilford County Commissioner Skip Alston as its manager and agent of this for-profit corporation.

Alston has said the owners of Museum Landlord LLC are Alston, Greensboro attorney and Sit-in Movement LLC board member Doug Harris, retired Vice President of Community Relations for WFMY-TV Shirley Frye, Smith Moore Leatherwood attorney Carole Bruce and former President and current adviser to the Weaver Foundation Skip Moore.

Matheny, however, said that Frye, Bruce and Moore have withdrawn from the LLC, which leaves Alston and Harris.

Alston is also listed as the agent and manager for Museum Tenant LLC and Civil Rights Museum LLC, and the agent for Sit-In Movement LLC and ICRCM LLC.

Of the five LLC’s, only one lists more than one company official. ICRCM LLC lists five managers: Alston, former City Councilmember and state House Rep. Earl Jones, City Councilmember Yvonne Johnson, Robert Brown and Harris. Johnson said she has never been to company meeting.

Sit-in Movement LLC was incorporated in 1993 by Alston and Jones.

...Both Museum Landlord LLC and Museum Tenant LLC are controlled by their managing member, ICRCM LLC.

ICRCM LLC is the managing member and owns 80 percent of Museum Landlord LLC. Another 10 percent of Museum Landlord LLC is owned by Museum Tenant LLC. The remaining 10 percent ownership stake in Museum Landlord LLC is owned by Stonehenge Community Develop LLC, which manages the investments of investors who got new markets tax credits for investing in the museum.

ICRCM LLC is the managing member of Museum Tenant LLC, but only owns 0.01 percent of it. The other 99.99 percent of Museum Tenant LLC is owned by Community Historic Credit Fund LLC, which apparently represents investors who got historic tax credits for investing in the museum.

...Museum Landlord LLC subleases aspects of the museum to Museum Tenant LLC, Civil Rights Museum LLC and Sit-in Movement Inc., which rents the second floor of the building.

The LLCs also owe each other money."

John Hammer

Saturday, June 18, 2016

As expected, Margaret Moffitt spins Nancy Vaughan's legal bill story for Greensboro's rulers

This is sickening;
Bill details attorneys' work for Vaughan over deposition in city lawsuit
"...The work, which cost city taxpayers about $8,500, included meetings with Carole Albright, an attorney at the firm who specializes in domestic law. ...she doesn’t remember the nature of her conversations with Vaughan during those October meetings.  ...Albright said Friday that her practice isn’t limited to domestic law, and that she doesn’t remember the nature of her conversations with Vaughan during those October meetings
...Vaughan was deposed because Robert said he had private conversations with her that contradict statements by the city. ...Vaughan denied that...
...Albright, like Rossabi, was a member of Vaughan’s personal team. The bill shows charges for six instances when Albright worked on the case between Oct. 6 and Oct. 29.
...Vaughan didn’t respond Friday to the News & Record’s requests to discuss the matter.  She said in October that she would use her own money to pay Rossabi.
Margaret Moffitt doesn't bother telling her readers Greensboro's mayor lied to the public before an election, and when the billing came to light, everybody who had something to lose got together and 'fixed it' for Nancy.

As for what other kinds of law Albright practices, there are none listed;

http://www.lawfirmrbs.com/attorney_profiles_details.cfm?aid=3
The lies keep piling up. Carole doesn't remember a thing after six contacts and Vaughan won't comment. That's what's called a cover up.


"Practiced family law in Greensboro, NC, 1995-1999" and "Returned to practice family law in December 2006" and "Guilford College Paralegal Program, Adjunct Family Law Professor, 2011-present" and "Legal Elite, Family Law, Business North Carolina Magazine, 2015" and "Greensboro Bar Association, Chair: Family Law Section 2011-2012" and "North Carolina Board Certified Specialist in Family Law" and "Family Life Council, Board of Directors (2005-2009), Secretary (2006-2009)" and finally, "Greensboro Day School, Field Hockey Coach (2000-2006, 2010-present), Lacrosse Coach (2002-2004)"

Nancy was "Member Board of Trustees, Greensboro Day School, 2009 – December 2013 (4 years)"

Carole doesn't remember a thing.

Friday, June 17, 2016

Greensboro's ruling class, the News and Record and the Rhino Times only different; Rigged Elections "DNC Used Media to Rig Election for Hillary

"DNC Used Media to Rig Election for Hillary

...leaked emails show the DNC colluded with mainstream outlets to heavily favor Clinton.

Ever notice how favorable emails by Mike Barber appear in news print
immediately after messages are sent, 
Margaret Moffitt, Steven Doyle and John Hammer?

“Our goals in the coming months will be to frame the Republican field and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast between the GOP field and HRC,” reads an email dated May 26, 2015, referencing the former secretary of state by her initials, posted by “Guccifer 2.0” — after the Romanian hacker who allegedly accessed Clinton’s private email server multiple times.

If Hillary Clinton shouldn't receive a national security clearance,
how can she become president, unless the press helps make it happen?

Just like how the News and Record won't report Nancy Vaughan 
lying about when who hired a lawyer, or why and how who paid for the lawyer

One of the strategies listed for “positioning and public messaging” states, “Use specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC.”

Zack Matheny, Zack Matheny

...this collusion to steer the narrative in Hillary’s favor appears to have gone unnoticed

...this series of leaked emails show a meticulously plotted coordination between DNC narratives touting Clinton, rather than Sanders, as if she had been the presumptive nominee from the outset — precisely as activists and fair elections advocates had suspected.

Like the redistricting debate last year
which Mike Barber has now confessed was just bullshit
by wanting to drop the lawsuit

Under the heading “Tactics,” the document states, “Working with the DNC and allied groups, we will use several different methods to land these attacks” — including, under the subheading, “Reporter Outreach”:

Amanda Lehmert now works for the City of Greensboro

“Working through the DNC and others, we should use background briefings, prep with reporters for interviews with GOP candidates, off-the-record conversations and oppo pitches to help pitch stories with no fingerprints and utilize reporters to drive a message.” And under “Bracketing Events,” the email states: “Both the DNC and outside groups are looking to do events and press surrounding Republican events to insert our messaging into their press and to force them to answer questions around key issues.”

The non-riot downtown after Chris Wilson invited East Greensboro youth
to watch a movie starring mostly white people
followed by massive disinformation by the City, Council and the Rhino Times 

...“Our goal is to use this conversation to answer the questions who do we want to run against and how best to leverage other candidates to maneuver them into the right place.”

...the irony of the former First Lady pontificating on ‘stacked decks’ for the elite bears a startling degree of hypocrisy in this context.

Nancy Vaughan, Mike Barber and Zack Matheny
who now want to borrow $25 million for 'downtown'

...as Sanders continued to experience success despite a veritable media blackout, a few mainstream outlets resorted to outright hostility to achieve a pro-Clinton message.

...To say the corporate, mainstream media has been complicit in a coordinated effort to grant Hillary the nomination would be an egregious understatement of reality. Though irate voters and journalists with actual integrity across the country immediately called out the Associated Press’ premature announcement Clinton had won the nomination as farce, it’s clear — particularly with these leaked emails — that had been the end game from the outset.

Ask Marc Ridgill among others

US Uncut reported neither the DNC nor the Clinton campaign returned request for comment.

DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ even rebuffed claims Sanders had not received fair treatment in the press during an April interview with the Daily Show’s Trevor Noah:

“You know, as powerful as that makes me feel, I’m not doing a very good job of rigging the outcome, or … blocking anyone from being able to get their message out.”

http://theantimedia.org/leaked-emails-dnc-rig-media-hillary/

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Jeff Sykes; "Why are so many of us willing to accept mediocrity in our political leaders?"

"It’s a question I keep coming back to in regards to a variety of issues, from the presidential primaries for the two major political parties to the recent shameful actions of the Greensboro City Council, with a nod to the hayseeds running things down in Raleigh.

...Perhaps now that a council critter can earn $22,140 a year for their service we might attract better candidates. Or at least some willing to stand up for the little guy.

Greensboro's City Council voted for a pay raise at an afternoon, non televised meeting,
and then voted for it without mention in the budget votes at the next meeting
without public discussion etc...

The spectacle of Mayor Nancy Vaughan threatening to remove activist Lewis Pitts from a meeting recently was one of the most heavy-handed tactics I’ve seen in local government. I mean, it wasn’t as bad as Mike Barber leading the council in a headlong retreat from a public hearing on the DGI contract, but it was pretty lame.

Mike Barber makes money from Greensboro taxpayers
over and above what he receives in income as a City Councilman
and multiple acts of journalistic cowardice 
by the News and Record's Margaret Moffett, Joe Killian and Steven Doyle among others
have prevented the information from wide dissemination

Pitts, a long-time civil rights attorney who recently retired from the state bar, stood during a recent council meeting to beg to differ with the council’s intent to pass a police body camera video policy without public review or comment. Jamal Fox even made a motion to pass the policy without some on council having read it. Seriously?

Jamal Fox is owned by his campaign contributors

...Pitts, then, rightly objected when the city council brought the policy up for approval about two weeks prior to the anticipated meeting time. It was similar to the pay raise in that the item wasn’t on the advertised agenda given to the public before hand.

Why the rush, Madame Mayor? I suppose when you win an election with 80 percent of the vote you can consider alienating the affection of those who once thought you’d bring a different leadership style. What do the city or the individuals on council have to fear from transparent and robust debate of the city’s most important issues?

A most disgusting example of the cronyism and insider wheel greasing that limits Greensboro’s growth is the atrocious handling of the competitive Downtown Business Improvement District contract.

"Key downtown property owners 
[who have received a great deal of Greensboro taxpayer money] 
back DGI for contract" [for their lobbyist, Zack Matheny]
which the cowards at the News and Record didn't report

Yes that's you Margaret Moffett

...here we had an organization, DGI, that has done next to nothing in several years to visibly move Downtown Greensboro forward. Oh sure man, having the president of the group go to a luncheon or speak to another booster group or launch the umpteenth study on what Greensboro really needs is great and all, but beyond the flowers downtown what’s been visible?

Now just imagine if Robert and Evan Morrison of Hudson’s Hill, two of the most celebrated and acknowledge creative individuals in Downtown Greensboro, were set loose to Make Greensboro Cool Again.

That must have scared the living crap out of the oligarchs who run downtown because the next thing you knew there was Mike Barber leading nothing short of a panicked retreat from council chambers after Robert expressed concern about DGI’s insider contacts with city staff. It had come to light that the city’s selection committee asked DGI to alter its proposal the week after the deadline for submissions. Both Morrison and Robert said it seemed unfair. But when Robert began to reach his eloquent best, Barber cut him off midsentence to ask for an immediate recess. Video of the meeting shows Barber aggressively waving his arm for council to follow him out the door. 

Barber's First Tee income is dependent on the City of Greensboro 
via the Bryan Foundation and the City of Greensboro funded Gillespie Golf Course 
and Jim's Bryan Foundation funds the Wyndham Championship via Mark Brazil, 
who sits on both the Wyndham and First Tee of the Triad's boards,
both funded by Jim Melvin's Bryan Foundation.

Before Robert could react, there was Nancy Hoffman and Jamal Fox halfway out the door with Barber hot on their heels.

The mayor moved the item to be postponed until June 7 once the council gathered itself and found the intestinal fortitude to return to the arena and face criticism from a taxpaying American.

By the end of the week Mayor Vaughan asked the DGI contract to be quietly added to the agenda of a work session on Monday, May 23 at 1:30 p.m. That way Robert and Morrison and their cadre of rag tag visionaries couldn’t muster their forces to come and speak in opposition to the notion that DGI represents the best of Greensboro. City Attorney Tom Carruthers initially approved the mayor’s request, despite the fact that she made a motion in open session during a public hearing to continue the item to June 7. I knew instinctively that this was impossible, but before I was able to raise the issue, Carruthers realized his error.

“Once continued, it cannot be moved again absent further advertising or by motion heard on June 7th,” Carruthers wrote in an email to council members late on the afternoon of May 20.

Mike Barber didn't disclose his financial interest
in Wyndham subsidized First Tee of the Triad's use of free City funded services
on his Council Economic Interest Disclosure signed on February 24, 2014,
while funding police and emergency services for the Wyndham Championship
while/after recieving monies from the Wyndham Championship to fund his income
via First Tee of the Triad, and then he voted to have Zack Matheny run DGI
with taxpayer monies used to fund Barber's personal income
while he uses City employees for moving golf carts etc... to his personal residence

It’s not like Mayor Vaughan to rush.

After all, she’s the one that lets leftist political activists make a mockery of decorum in council chambers and here she is afraid to let two taxpaying Americans have their say on a matter of public policy and spending."

http://yesweekly.com/article-21431-mediocre-politicians-live-in-fear-of-the-truth.html
.
.
Greensboro Mayor Nancy Vaughan; "If I Could Be Just Completely Honest For A Second, I Believe Exactly What You Believe"

http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2016/05/greensboro-mayor-nancy-vaughan-if-i.html

"Key downtown property owners [who have received a great deal of Greensboro taxpayer money] back DGI for contract" [for their lobbyist, Zack Matheny]

http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2016/05/key-downtown-property-owners-who-have.html

Tony Wilkins is going to have lunch with David Parrish and Zack Matheny before he votes for DGI's contract on the 7th

http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2016/05/tony-wilkins-is-going-to-have-lunch_24.html

DGI Contract Scandal Goes Full Retard, Corrupt and Reprehensible

http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2016/05/dgi-contract-scandal-goes-full-retard.html

Monday, June 13, 2016

Updated; Updated; Mayor Nancy Vaughan, the City of Greensboro and the News and Record's Margaret Moffett lied to the public on Vaughan's legal [subsidy] bill

Jeff Sykes, June 9, 2016; City pays personal legal fees for Mayor Vaughan

The City of Greensboro has paid more than $8,500 in legal fees for an outside law firm to personally represent Mayor Nancy Vaughan in a case involving environmental cleanup funds for the South Elm Redevelopment, more commonly known as Union Square.

...In an article published in the Greensboro News & Record in October, it was reported that Vaughan intended to pay her own expenses for hiring Amiel Rossabi to represent her personally during the legal proceedings. ...A Rhino Times article in January reported that Vaughan "hired Amiel Rossabi, of Rossabi, Black and Slaughter to represent her personally, the day before the deposition.

And the City did nothing to counter the reported facts
that Vaughan didn't hire a lawyer in October, 2015
as the City hired Rossabi in September, 2015 for the deposition
meaning City Manager Jim Westmoreland and other staff lied to the public
and the News and Record reported the story as transmitted by the City

"Rossabi advised his client Vaughan not to answer the questions asked during the deposition including: “Mayor Vaughan, have you ever been deposed before?” As well as, “Would you state your full name for the record, Mayor Vaughan?”


The first time Vaughan was deposed, she hired Amiel Rossabi,
of Rossabi, Black and Slaughter to represent her personally,
the day before the deposition. 

Who told John Hammer Amiel was hired the day before?

The deposition devolved into a verbal battle 
between Rossabi and Robert’s attorney, Scott Hale of Boydoh & Hale.

Patrick Kane of Smith Moore Leatherwood and Carruthers
were also present for the deposition but didn’t become involved in the verbal brawl.



In a memo dated June 7, 2016 and released following a record's request by YES! Weekly, Chief Deputy City Attorney Jo Peterson-Buie addresses the $8,545 legal payment to Rossabi's former law firm. Rossabi Black and Slaughter billed the city for Vaughan's legal fees on Feb. 17 of this year. The firm broke up on May 1 and the new firm, Black Slaughter Black requested payment. Rossabi formed Rossabi Law Partners and confirmed that the payment for representing Vaughan should go to his former partners.

The memo states that the city entered into a contract with Rossabi Black and Slaughter on Sept. 21, 2015. 


I have asked for a copy of the contract from the City

The memo states that Rossabi represented Vaughan at her deposition on Oct. 21. The memo mentions no additional representation. 

Vaughan, the City, Margaret Moffett and the News and Record lied to their readers
Greensboro's taxpayers and the public

.
.
Margaret Moffett; City to pay mayor's legal bill for deposition, Saturday, June 11, 2016 7:12 pm

"Taxpayers will pay more than $8,500 for the private lawyer Mayor Nancy Vaughan used last year during a deposition in a downtown developer’s lawsuit against the city.

Before the 2015 Greensboro City Council election

Vaughan said in October [2015, right before the election,] she would use her own money to pay the attorney who represented her personally during the deposition

After the City "entered into a contract with Rossabi Black and Slaughter on Sept. 21, 2015
meaning Mayor Vaughan and Margaret Moffett lied, 
as Jeff Sykes reported the Sept. 21, 2015 contract info on June 9, 2012,
meaning the News and Record purposefully mislead its readers
for the benefit of Greensboro Mayor Nancy Vaughan and Jim Westmoreland

On Friday, Vaughan said she changed her mind after learning from City Attorney Tom Carruthers that it would be “entirely appropriate” for the city to cover her fees to Amiel Rossabi.

The contract for Rossabi's services 
was "entered into a contract with Rossabi Black and Slaughter on Sept. 21, 2015
meaning Mayor Vaughan and Margaret Moffett lied

When did the conversation take place?

So Vaughan hired Rossabi, who directed Vaughan not to answer many of the questions during the deposition.

Which isn't true, as the City hired Rossabi on September 21, 2015
to represent Nancy Vaughan at the deposition
directly before a City Council election
meaning the election was rigged with the help of City staff and the News and Record

Paying Rossabi’s bill puts the city in an unusual position, since it is simultaneously arguing that it should not pay former Police Chief David Wray’s legal fees.

...Vaughan said she made the right decision letting the city pay Rossabi’s bill.

The decision was made in September, 2015 before the City Council election
and then Nancy Vaughan lied about it with the help of the News and Record's Margaret Moffitt

“There was no logical reason why I would be deposed,” Vaughan said. “It was a strong-arm tactic to force a settlement. I wasn’t going to be bullied by the opposing attorney.”

“It’s unfortunate that we’ve wasted so much money on this case.”

http://www.greensboro.com/news/local_news/city-to-pay-mayor-s-legal-bill-for-deposition/article_48327874-9e0a-5372-981f-686d2f2f08a0.html

Nancy Vaughan and City staff were not honest, fair or responsible
to Greensboro's citizens.

Nancy Vaughan used her office for personal gain
by saying she was paying for council after the City signed a contract
with the same attorney for [dissimilar] services before an election;


So what work did the firm receive from the City
and how much more have they made total?

So it's not just "more than $8,500"?

How much more did they receive for services rendered,
and still undisclosed by the City or mayor Vaughan?


Public confidence in the integrity of its local government has been harmed
and now it looks like Amiel Rossabi wasn't prepared
and is now misleading the public as the contract was signed in September, 2015;

https://www.facebook.com/jeffreyhsykes?fref=nf

Hat Tip; Actual journalist Jeff Sykes
.
.
That being said, watch the whole thing disappear...

Monday, May 30, 2016

Dear businesses looking to relocate or expand in Greensboro, North Carolina

Our elected leadership, of which some appear to have been “purchased” by entrenched special interests through campaign donations, and some City government employees, regularly act to retard potential profitability in order to support “chosen” for-profit businesses who provide “grants” or campaign contributions in exchange for monopolistic government contracts like Mike Barber's First Tee of the Triad and Zack Matheny's DGI.   Legislated benefits like free streets and sweet real estate deals are unavailable to the non-wheel greasing general public, but only to those who have funded the campaigns of the inexpensive stooges who fork over taxpayer owned resources to their masters.  

As we wait for City Council to decide which 'necessary' infrastructure debt is to be voted on in the upcoming election, at least $55 million in debt voted on by Council justified with bullshit math which Margaret Moffett, Susan Ladd, Allen Johnson, Doug Clark and Steven Doyle at the News and Record didn't bother to investigate, directly lined the pockets of Council campaign contributors, which has never been reported and most likely will not be, as it would be counter to Warren Buffett's broader interests for a local paper he owns to point out what Warren does best.

Disappointment may follow expectations of Greensboro’s News and Record, that used to be our paper of record and the Rhino Times, our most 'conservative' weekly, now owned by HB2 supporter Roy Carroll, defending free market capitalism and support for local for-profit small businesses against Greensboro's bought and paid for fascistic government intervention for the upper crust.

The News and Record and the Rhino's 'editorial boards' appear to be indifferent to the entrepreneurial spirit that made America a great country.  John Hammer has his head so far up Roy's ass he can't hear the behind the door insults he justifiably receives for betraying his profession by selling out and shilling propaganda for profit paid for by his reader's tax payments.

Many may be coming to realize that an oligarchy of a majority of Greensboro’s elected leadership, elite business interests, news executives and top city and county employees have set upon the course of transferring wealth out of the hands of taxpayers and small unconnected businesses to a select chosen few, while the overwhelming majority of the population remains unaware, because Margaret Moffett, Susan Ladd, Allen Johnson, Doug Clark and Steven Doyle won't do or are prevented from doing their jobs.

How else could the News and Record not point out local bigs like Roy who funded the legislators who voted for HB2?  They all seem to be on the same team when it comes to shielding local elites from public scrutiny.  That's how public corruption is allowed to happen.

Oligarchy

A form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons
or in a dominant class or clique;

Government by the few.

Dictionary.com

The following is from Roy Carroll's Rhino Times, written by John Hammer, who defended HB2 for Roy, who contributed to a bunch of the legislators who voted for it without being held to account via multiple acts of journalistic cowardice by Margaret Moffett, Susan Ladd, Allen Johnson, Doug Clark and Steven Doyle at the News and Record.  

Some of this needs to be copy and pasted before Roy and John take it off the Rhino site, like they did with the local net worth article, and after John went under, and after the News and Record did the same on multiples of occasions within five years or so;

"...In cities that have passed laws similar to those in Charlotte, men have been apprehended for hanging out in women’s bathrooms and locker rooms.  Their defense was that they identified as women...

Except Pat McCrory couldn't come up with any when asked about it on national TV, 
making North Carolina look bad, costing us jobs and economic growth, 
and John Hammer and Roy Carroll were with Pat on the subject until they went silent
after it become clear Roy Carroll and friends hurt our City and state with their actions

...It’s hard to believe that the fact that men should use the men’s restroom and women should use the women’s restroom is controversial... Who knew that men had a fundamental right to go in the bathrooms and locker rooms designated for women?

...One aspect of the ordinance that the Charlotte City Council seemed to ignore is the fact that men are frequently arrested for drilling holes in the walls of public bathrooms and peeping at women.

...If these men are willing to risk arrest by drilling peepholes and peering through them, do people actually believe they would hesitate to claim they are transgender in order to have access to a woman’s bathroom?

If a man says that he identifies as a woman, who is to say that he doesn’t?  Before Bruce Jenner had surgery and became Caitlyn Jenner, he certainly looked nothing like a woman, but he says he identified as a woman.

He/she didn't have surgery, meaning John Hammer misled the public on the issue

...State Rep. Jon Hardister of Greensboro brought up an aspect of HB 2 that has received little press.  Hardister said, “Charlotte overstepped its authority."

The High Point Market, better known as the furniture market, is ignoring an old adage, “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.”  The furniture market receives $1.2 million for marketing and $1.2 million for transportation from the state each year.

In the state budget passed last year, state Sen. Trudy Wade, who represents High Point, fought hard for the furniture market and got the allocation raised by $544,000 per year to the present level.

John Hammer threatened the Furniture Market for Roy Carroll
to advance support for HB2 and the legislators Roy funded who voted for it
which the News and Record won't report via cowardice

By joining the onslaught of opposition to HB 2, the furniture market may have put that funding in jeopardy...

http://rhinotimes.com/Content/Default/One-Click-Reading/Article/NC-Restrooms-Same-As-They-Ever-Were/-3/6/1126
.
.
More from John and Roy;

Most of what I’ve read in the mainstream media about the whole bathroom brouhaha has been either wrong or based on faulty information.

...the majority of people agree with HB2, whether they know it or not.

Apparently not, now including Art Pope, John Hood and Pat McCrory etc... 

...The debate has little to do with transgender people using one restroom or shower or the other.  That’s a smokescreen.  The issue is what is set out in the Charlotte ordinance – whether our society wants to have gender-neutral facilities or facilities segregated by biological sex.

Not really

Charlotte’s ordinance required all bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, saunas, everything except maybe OB-GYN examination rooms, to be gender neutral.

Not really

...The reason the opponents of HB2 are trying to make it sound like transgender people are being discriminated against is political.  The people out protesting may believe the issue is about transgender people, but it appears the folks calling the shots want gender-neutral bathrooms.  They want all of us to act like there is no difference between men and women – wake up one day and be a woman and the next day be a man.  There is the problem of biological differences, but they ignore the fact that men and women are physically different.

http://www.rhinotimes.com/Content/Default/Columns/Article/Weekly-Hammer-May-19/-3/7/1214
.
.
Tuesday, April 26, 2016; A few questions for the City of Charlotte concerning HB2

http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2016/04/a-few-questions-for-city-of-charlotte.html
.
.
More from John and Roy, which the News and Record didn't have the guts to call them out on;

"...The law treats all people the same.  

No it doesn't and it's not enforceable

What HB2 establishes is that in North Carolina people are required to use the restroom that corresponds with their biological sex.  The Charlotte ordinance – which Charlotte did not have the authority to pass...

Not really, otherwise the state could have just sued Charlotte,
but they didn't

Since transgender is not defined, this would have allowed men to use the women’s restroom and women to use the men’s restroom.  In effect, all restrooms and locker rooms would be gender neutral.

Not true 

Blatant lie not identified by the News and Record

HB2 allows any business including the High Point furniture market to have gender-neutral restrooms if they so desire.  The decision is left up to the owner of the business.

,,,Vaughan allowed state Rep. John Blust, who is a candidate in the Republican primary for the 13th Congressional District, to speak first and gave him some additional time to explain what the state statute he voted for did.

Blust said that the topic was one that he was almost embarrassed to talk about in public, but that the state had been forced to regulate the behavior of people in bathrooms.  He said, “it seems common sense that everyone use the bathroom based on their anatomy.” Blust said, “Charlotte did not have the statutory authority to do what it did.”

Not really

...Blust was allowed to start again and said, “As the parent of a young daughter, I’m not willing to have her, her classmates, teammates and friends, go into the girls locker room and undress in front of someone with the male anatomy.” 

Which wouldn't happen in real life,
just like it doesn't happen now in real life

...The legislators held public hearings and heard everyone who signed up to speak on the bill before it was passed.

Bullshit, and John Hammer and Roy Carroll know it, 
and so does Margaret Moffett, Susan Ladd, 
Allen Johnson, Doug Clark and Steven Doyle at the News and Record, 
who committed journalistic malpractice by not pointing it out,
meaning they are just as at fault as John, Roy, Art Pope etc... 
for the economic mess our state has found itself to be in

...Chris Hardin, a candidate in the Republican primary for the 6th Congressional District, got shouted down by opponents to HB2 several times.  He said the law was not about discrimination but about common sense.  He said that allowing the Charlotte ordinance to stand would have had a detrimental effect on law enforcement.

.
.
And again from John Hammer and Roy Carroll, which wasn't reported by the News and Record;

"Rep. John Blust of Greensboro, a candidate for the 13th Congressional District seat, said nobody in Raleigh was talking about HB2.  He said, “I haven’t said anything about changing or repealing anything.”

Really?

Blust said that he was completely misquoted in the article and what he had actually said was that he hadn’t heard anyone say anything about amending the bill so he couldn’t comment on it.  ...Blust said, “I don’t even like to show a blink of an eye over this.”...

Rep. Jon Hardister from Greensboro, who is quoted extensively in the article, said the quotes were technically accurate but taken out of context.  He said, “I was surprised when I saw the article, not because of my quotes but because of the way they were presented.”

...A constitutional amendment would make the law requiring separate bathrooms for men and women more powerful.

Sen. Trudy Wade of Greensboro said, “We have not discussed changing anything at all.”

Rep. Harry Warren from Salisbury, who, like Blust, is a candidate in the 13th Congressional District race, said, “I’m not in favor of going back at all on HB2.”

Apparently not anymore after these folks turned our state
into a national discrace

State Sen. Andrew Brock, also running for Congress in the 13th District, said, “HB2 is a great bill.”

Hardister said, “I’m not working with anyone to repeal the bill or to amend it, but discussions are taking place and there could be changes.”

Hardister said he thought it was possible the portion of the bill that made it more difficult to sue over discrimination in state court could be amended.

Hardister said that one of his complaints about the coverage of the bill in the N&R is that it made it sound like protections for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community had been repealed, which he said was misleading because “LGBT was not a protected class before HB2.”  He noted that the legislature had not made LGBT a protected class...

Jon Hardister was all in until Art Pope, John Hood and Pat McCrory 

What the law does do is make it clear that local jurisdictions can’t create their own protected classes but that the decision on protected classes will be made at the state level."

http://www.rhinotimes.com/Content/Default/City/Article/More-HB2-Misrepresentations/-3/18/1195

Thursday, May 19, 2016

Greensboro's News and Record's Margaret Moffett misleads readers for Mike Barber and Nancy Vaughan

Whether the council’s actions were legal
depends on whether a majority of members continued to discuss the contract issue privately...

...They didn’t, reported the News & Record’s Margaret Moffett.

Doug Clark and Allen Johnson

John Hammer; "Speaker Drives Council into Kitchen

As a result of deliberations at what was clearly an illegal private meeting, the Greensboro City Council postponed action on awarding the contract to allocate the downtown Business Improvement District (BID) funds at its regular meeting on Tuesday, May 17, in the Council Chambers.

The problem is that the deliberations on how to handle the contract were not done in the Council Chambers with the public present and in front of the television cameras, or even with the city clerk taking minutes.  It was done in the backroom with only councilmembers and two reporters present.

The fact that the reporters were welcomed into the meeting doesn’t meet the definition of a public meeting according to the North Carolina open meetings law.  The meeting in the hallway outside the council offices and in the small kitchen area was clearly held to make a decision in private rather than in public, as is required by law.  It’s not enough to simply allow two reporters to attend the meeting; the public has to be invited and have access, and they did not.

Whether the council’s actions were legal
depends on whether a majority of members continued to discuss the contract issue privately...

...They didn’t, reported the News & Record’s Margaret Moffett.

Doug Clark and Allen Johnson

The public, the city clerk, the city attorney and Councilmember Tony Wilkins were all left in the Council Chambers when seven councilmembers (Councilmember Yvonne Johnson was absent) and two reporters went in the backroom to make a decision.

...Robert said that he had been told about an hour before the meeting that Downtown Greensboro Inc. (DGI) was allowed to revise its proposal five days after the deadline.

Zack Matheny cheated with David Parish's help

DGI used David Parish as a reference in the proposal

...Once they got back to the council offices, Barber said in response to a question from Banks about what was going on, “Based on the history of litigation, I think we need to postpone this for two weeks.”


Mike Barber violated North Carolina open meeting laws
by discussing the issue

...the other councilmembers did discuss the matter among themselves.

Margaret Moffett lied

It was certainly not a formal meeting in any fashion since most of the deliberation appeared to take place in the small kitchen where there were chicken wings and pizza, so there was a crush around the food, but in that crush the councilmembers were discussing what to do about the contract to award the downtown BID money.

Right after Barber made his statement, Councilmember Sharon Hightower asked if there were a time element involved in awarding the contract.


Margaret Moffett lied to News and Record readers

Mayor Nancy Vaughan said that DGI was funded through the end of the fiscal year, June 30, so delaying the contract for two weeks shouldn’t be a problem.


Nancy Vaughan discussed and deliberated illegally

Then councilmembers discussed rebidding the contract, since questions had been raised about the bid process.  But the decision made in the backroom was to have the staff go over the proposals and make certain that everything was in order and then award the contract at the next meeting, scheduled for June 7, the date of the congressional and state Supreme Court primaries in North Carolina.

City Attorney Tom Carruthers was late arriving at the backroom meeting and warned that no deliberations should be taking place.

Doug Clark and Allen Johnson misled News and Record readers

The councilmembers who were in the midst of deliberating said none were, but were still discussing whether to rebid the contract or not while they ate pizza and chicken wings..."

.
.
Allen Johnson and Doug Clark; "Whether the council’s actions were legal depends on whether a majority of members continued to discuss the contract issue privately, Jonathan Jones of the N.C. Open Government Coalition said in an email to blogger Roch Smith Jr. that was copied to media and council members. (They didn’t, reported the News & Record’s Margaret Moffett.)

...It gives the appearance of backroom discussion even if there was no violation of the open meetings law or if there was perhaps a relatively minor violation.

Doug Clark and Allen Johnson misled News and Record readers

...The question of DGI is especially sensitive. Its CEO, Zack Matheny, is a former council member. What’s more, before Matheny got the job in 2015, a DGI administrator alleged that a councilman — Barber — had pressed the nonprofit’s board to hire Matheny or risk losing city funding.

...Appearances do matter. And right now, our City Council isn’t looking so good."

http://www.greensboro.com/opinion/n_and_r_editorials/our-opinion-a-pregnant-pause/article_f086e976-4e4b-5904-8549-efe352a8d512.html
.
.
Margaret Moffett; "Council halts discussion on downtown contract amid allegation

In previous years, the council didn’t have to let other groups compete with DGI to get that contract. But a vote by the General Assembly changed that last September...

Councilman Mike Barber then asked for a recess. Council members left the chamber and walked back to the common area outside of their offices. John Hammer, editor of the Rhino Times, and I accompanied them.

Barber told council members they needed to stop the discussion until the city’s legal staff could investigate the matter.

“Based on the history of litigation, 
I think we need to postpone this for two weeks.”

Mike Barber

The council returned to open session a few minutes later, then voted to postpone its decision on who should get the contract.

Barber said afterward that he stopped the meeting after “hearing an allegation from one of the legal bidders that completely put the process in another context.”

The move was necessary, Barber said...

...Mayor Nancy Vaughan said the council needed to stop the meeting to make sure there is no hint of controversy when the council finally does vote on awarding the contract.

Mayor Nancy Vaughan said that DGI was funded through the end of the fiscal year, June 30, 
so delaying the contract for two weeks shouldn’t be a problem.

John Hammer

When someone with a history of litigation against the city makes an allegation, “you want to make sure you get it right,” she said."

http://www.greensboro.com/news/council-halts-discussion-on-downtown-contract-amid-allegation/article_b0dc63cc-a825-5901-8437-f9ed5e561e33.html

Margaret Moffitt lied for Nancy Vaughan, Mike Barber and the rest of council

Margaret should be removed from her position covering Greensboro's City Council
.
.
News and Record's Margaret Moffett; "Council halts discussion on downtown contract amid allegation"


On DGI at this evening's Greensboro City Council Meeting; This is what non-transparency looks like


The City of Greensboro shafted their own employees; "401(k) Fees, Already Low, Are Heading Lower"

Saturday, May 7, 2016

DGI proposal crookedness personified by conflicted references and connected cronies

Zack Matheny's proposal for Greensboro's downtown improvement district proposal has become a great example of how corrupted the City's staff and Council have become.  After listing Assistant City Manager David Parrish, who is said to be involved in determining who gets the contract as a reference, Matheny also lists ArtsGreensboro's Tom Philion, whose organization has is and continues to gain from City Council votes, making Tom a 'yes man' along with Parrish for references as Tom serves on DGI's board and takes money from taxpayers with Zack's help and the News and Record's complicity and profitability, as ArtsGreensboro pays the paper, literally, for positive press with the help of Margaret Moffett, who is in Mike Barber's back pocket, and has been for years. 

Zack is City Council and City Council's donor paymaster's pawn and lobbyist.  Now, via a clearly rigged RFP process, as Zack came in with a $999,771 proposal when the limit was $600,000, the game's outcome appears clearly predetermined and rigged for the inside elite crowd.

These folks have no problem pulling fictitious numbers out of their asses, as the local news industry is going to back them up without investigation or question.

Margaret Moffett is complicit, as her salary is partially paid for by ArtsGreensboro who pays the News and Record for propaganda



Here's the latest example of Tom Philion's take from the City of Greensboro budgeted handouts for nonprofits in in exchange for his reference for Zack's continued take from City taxpayers, written by none other than Margaret Moffett;

http://www.greensboro.com/gnr/inside-scoop-city-suggests-for-nonprofits-in-budget-proposal/article_aa1a2256-35ea-52b5-b4c9-18c4d0faa575.html

Previously;

Something is very wrong with Zack Matheny's DGI proposal, which just won approval by the City of Greensboro

http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2016/05/something-is-very-wrong-with-zack.html
.
.
Mayor Vaughan and Zack Matheny are Roy Carroll etc...'s pawns, along with most of council
as declared by multiples of high ranking City of Greensboro employees behind the backs of their crooked/fucked up/corrupt/crony leadership who are sick of being abused with lies told to the public by the News and Record and the Rhino Times 

Zack Matheny had a direct financial interest in applying for a job he voted to fund, and now Tom Philion and David Parrish and the rest of Council are in on getting Zack a new contract with an incorrect and overpriced proposal which violated the RFP rules of engagement, without consequence.

Zack Matheny, Nancy Vaughan and Mike Barber put their own interests of power, income and reelection in front of the best interests of City of Greensboro taxpayers, and the News and Record and the Rhino Times didn't report it, as they are in on the pay to play.

Mike Barber is a known liar who tried to extort the DGI job for Zack Matheny out of Cyndi Hayworth after Zack leaked Hayworth's lack of education credentials, leaving her ineligible for the job after Matheny helped get Jason Cannon fired to get the same job and the News and Record and the Rhino Times didn't report it and endorsed Mike Barber as he personally profits from taxpayer owned properties.
.
.
City Of Greensboro Subsidizes News & Record via ArtsGreensboro


http://greensboroperformingarts.blogspot.com/2014/06/city-of-greensboro-subsidizes-news.html
.
.
Still no word on Mike Barber's golf cart delivered to his home by a City of Greensboro employee, as Margaret Moffett has her head so far up his ass she won't investigate or report anything negative on her patron saint.